点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
花灯贺岁战鼓迎春 山西太原2100余人同台竞技“鼓足”干劲******
(新春走基层)花灯贺岁战鼓迎春 山西太原2100余人同台竞技“鼓足”干劲
中新网太原2月3日电 (记者 李庭耀)元宵节即将到来，正月十五闹红火是一种历史悠久的传统民俗文化活动。2月3日，山西太原万柏林区举行2023年“花灯贺岁 战鼓迎春”锣鼓大赛暨花灯展活动，来自全区14个街道选送的15支锣鼓代表队2100余人同台竞技、切磋交流，“鼓足”新一年的干劲。
活动现场，15支锣鼓代表队先后登场，矫健的身姿、摇曳的旌旗、喧天的锣鼓声，鼓手们铿锵有力的鼓点，如万马奔腾、豪放洒脱，又似春雷滚滚、撼人心魄。
来自万柏林区14个街道选送的15支锣鼓代表队1500余人同台竞技、切磋交流。 李庭耀 摄万柏林区委常委、宣传部部长张小军致辞时表示，回顾2022年，该区各项工作取得新进展，经济社会高质量发展取得新成效。全区经济基础稳固夯实、人民生活水平不断改善、社会治理水平不断提升，呈现出政治稳定、经济发展、社会进步、人民和谐幸福的良好局面。
展望2023年，万柏林区也将坚持稳中求进的工作总基调，科学谋划全年目标任务，全力抓好稳增长、促改革、调结构、惠民生、防风险各项工作，继续保持奋发进取的精神状态。
太原锣鼓是国家级非物质文化遗产，其渊源可追溯到先秦时期，最早形成大约在南宋宁宗年间，以铙、钹的特有声响取胜，风格强健有力、层次分明，动作劲烈舒展、粗犷阳刚，节奏激越鲜明，表演场面蔚为壮观。
太原锣鼓是国家级非物质文化遗产，其渊源可追溯到先秦时期，最早形成大约在南宋宁宗年间。 李庭耀 摄“我们组织了100人的锣鼓代表队参赛，包括辖区居民、鼓乐爱好者，不少人平时就会在广场、街心花园组织训练。”万柏林区千峰街道宣传科工作人员杨宇星介绍。
万柏林区和平街道窊流社区龙腾奋进锣鼓队100人参加此次比赛。领队闫永胜今年51岁，打锣鼓已有31年，他告诉记者，每年正月初六到正月十五，都有100名左右社区居民聚在一起打锣鼓，“大家一起庆祝过去一年的收获，憧憬来年，我们热爱打锣鼓，希望传承传统文化”。
万柏林区实验中学初一学生李泽邦也参加了此次比赛，他从去年开始练习锣鼓，“能够参赛我很自豪，以后也想继续练习锣鼓”。该校老师祁艳告诉记者，万柏林区实验中学已把非遗锣鼓文化纳入到校本课程中，学生们可以在指挥的统一引领下，演奏太原锣鼓中的“快流水”“慢流水”等曲牌，部分学生在此基础上进一步提升，可以演奏《秦王点兵》等经典锣鼓合奏。
此外，万柏林区还组织各单位参与花灯展活动，各式花灯营造出喜庆节日氛围，民众在领略传统民俗魅力的同时，也让该区人气热起来、消费旺起来、经济活起来、城市靓起来。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)